Skip to main content

The Korean Peninsula has fallen into a game of chicken without any guard rails

Image
By

 

*Foreign tourists looking at North Korea from the Korean Demilitarized Zone (DMZ). ⓒiStock

 

Il Young Jeong

Research Professor_Institute of Social Sciences_Sogang University


The cycle of North Korea's armed provocations and the ROK-US alliance's unyielding responses continues to repeat on the Korean peninsula. With both sides unwilling to back down, their confrontations have rocked the peninsula.

There are several reasons that lead me to believe that the current Korean Peninsula is closer to possibility of an armed clash than any other time since the Korean War. Allow me to explain.

 

1. North Korea isn’t using armed provocation as a negotiation tactic.

In the past, North Korea's armed provocations were generally interpreted as "for the purpose of gaining an upper hand in negotiations". When a new administration was established in the U.S. or South Korea or multilateral negotiations had fallen into a lull, North Korea often used armed provocations to put pressure on their counterparts in an attempt to take the lead in negotiations. In other words, North Korea’s preferred strategy was ‘brinksmanship.’

However, North Korea is no longer considering participating in negotiations. While the June 2019 US-ROK-DPRK meeting at Panmunjom seemed to revive hopes of continued talks following the failed Hanoi summit in February that year, the June meeting proved to be the end of dialogue with the North. Since then, the North has refused any dialogue with either the US or South Korea.

Why is North Korea refusing to negotiate? So far, North Korea has sought a security guarantee from the United States. However, the regime has since opted instead to guarantee its own survival through nuclear weapons. Ultimately, North Korea's provocations will continue until the regime proves that it can carry out a preemptive strike the U.S. mainland with a miniaturized nuclear weapon equipped ICBM.

 

2. Effective sanctions against North Korea have reached their limit

After North Korea conducted three nuclear tests in 2016 and 2017, the international community implemented strong economic sanctions against North Korea, centering on the UN Security Council. On top of that, the COVID-19 pandemic that began in 2020 effectively resulted in a near-perfect (self-imposed) blockade of North Korea.

The reason why international sanctions against North Korea were effective was that South Korea, China, and Russia all actively participated in the sanctions regime. However, cracks have started to form in the once strong sanctions alliance. The growing strategic competition between the US and China is making cooperation between the two countries difficult on the Korean Peninsula. At the same time, Russia's invasion of Ukraine has also led to US sanctions against Russia.

North Korea fired three intercontinental ballistic missiles Last year and was referred to the U.N. Security Council, but China and Russia blocked any further sanctions. In the end, with China and Russia placing responsibility for the Korean Peninsula issue on the US, it seems highly unlikely that the U.N. Security Council will be able to adopt any sanctions against North Korea even if the country conducts a seventh nuclear test.

Moreover, North Korea has so far endured five years of isolation since December 2017 (UN Resolution 2397), when the current sanctions against North Korea began. This only goes to show that North Korea will not easily surrender under the force of sanctions.

 

3. South Korea and the United States are not looking to avoid a fight

Currently, there is no exit or mediator to facilitate an escape from this charged atmosphere. Even the South Korean government, which sought dialogue when the military confrontation between the U.S. and North Korea intensified, is now countering the North’s provocations with strong military measures of its own. Both South Korea and the US are responding to North Korea's provocations head-on with increased military power.

Recently, the R.O.K.-U.S. alliance resumed large-scale joint landing exercises for the first time in five years, including the Royal Marines. North Korea is also responding by launching an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM).

China, which has led multilateral discussions on denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula in the past, is also keeping an eye on the situation but is stuck in an awkward position unable to act. China is in a situation where it can neither support nor criticize either side. China will not want the North Korean nuclear issue to snowball into a U.S.-China conflict of any kind.

 

We need a mediator or messenger of peace

As I write this, I realize that there has never been a time in my career when it has been more difficult for me to come up with a solution for the current situation. The Korean Peninsula is currently under an armistice. This system is imperfect. In particular, armed clashes can occur at any time in the West Sea or at the armistice line, as they often do whenever inter-Korean relations deteriorate. It bears remembering that Seoul – home to ten million Koreans – lies just 60 kilometers from that armistice line.

This confrontation between the South and the North, with no exit in sight, has turned into a game of chicken. It could very well bring about irreversible catastrophe. I think only possible answer for the present predicament is 'civil society'.

But, unfortunately, the influence of the state has expanded in the COVID-19 era, and civil society is shrinking. Nevertheless, we must use the power of democracy to calm the government, which exercises exclusive control over inter-Korean relations, and demand solutions for peace on the Korean Peninsula.

Under the current circumstances, solidarity and support from the international community will be essential to creating peace on the Korean Peninsula. We will likely need to push for third-party mediators to visit North Korea to mediate the conflict, as the late former US President Carter did in the past. In this sense, Pope Francis' visit to North Korea would be more welcome than ever.

 

*IL-Young Jeong is a research professor at Sogang University in Seoul. His key research interests include North Korea's social control system, inter-Korean relations, and peace on the Korean Peninsula.

*This article is a column published in OhmyNews. http://omn.kr/21i4q

 

 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Best click

South Korea’s New Government Must Realize Participatory Democracy in Its North Korea and Unification Policy

By
* The Newly Inaugurated Lee Jae-myung Administration,  @ Office of the President of the Republic of Korea Il Young Jeong Research Professor_Institute of Social Science_Sogang University With the inauguration of the Lee Jae-myung administration in South Korea, the propaganda broadcasts that once echoed across the inter-Korean border have come to a halt. This is perhaps one of the most dramatic signs of the change brought about by the shift in power. Encouraged by North Korea’s active response, the South Korean government is now cautiously exploring ways to resume inter-Korean dialogue. Recently, the Lee administration launched the National Policy Planning Committee, chaired by Lee Han-joo, and has begun the process of formulating policy tasks across various sectors. This article proposes steps the government should take to restore procedural democracy and realize participatory democracy in the formulation and implementation of its North Korea and unification policies.   An ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A 'Proper Distance' Is Needed in Inter-Korean Relations

By
* The Bridge of No Return in the Korean Demilitarized Zone (DMZ)   @iStock Il Young Jeong Research Professor_Institute of Social Science_Sogang University On December 3 of last year, political turmoil erupted in South Korea following the declaration of martial law by former President Yoon Suk-yeol. This crisis ultimately concluded with Yoon's impeachment. Now, South Korea is preparing for an early presidential election. The people’s courageous stand against the coup attempt has safeguarded democracy, and their choice at the ballot box is just one month away.   The daunting array of domestic and international challenges ahead leaves no room for complacency. South Korea now faces a presidential election amid what may be the gravest national crisis in its modern history. This article proposes policy alternatives concerning the Korean Peninsula that the new government should consider. In particular, it offers suggestions for how inter-Korean relations should be managed going forwa...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why the U.S. and China Need to Work Together for Peace on the Korean Peninsula

By
  * We need to come up with a new type of multilateral cooperation in which the U.S. and China can cooperate to resolve the North Korean nuclear issue together. ⓒ iStock Il Young Jeong Research Professor_Institute of Social Sciences_Sogang University Recently, the atmosphere surrounding Korea and its neighbors has been quite unusual. Rather than an overarching trend influencing events in the regions, an array of different sources and trends are coming together to effect change in the region. In this article, I will analyze the situation in Northeast Asia from the perspective of the Korean Peninsula and discuss how best to respond.   The quiet resurrection of the Northern Triangle(North Korea-China-Russia) and the Southern Triangle(South Korea-U.S.-Japan) In the early 1990s, with the wind-down of the Cold War, the Roh Tae-woo administration in South Korea effectively broke down the confrontational structure on the peninsula(the so-called Northern Triangle vs. Southern trian...
Post a Comment
Read more