Skip to main content

The Growth of the K-Defense Industry Should Lead to Greater Democratic Control

 

*A K2 Black Panther, the pride of Korea, practicing shooting. @iStock

 

Il Young Jeong

Research Professor_Institute of Social Sciences_Sogang University


Expectations for the K-defense industry have been rising recently. In July, 2022, the Korean government signed an export contract worth about $12.4 billion with Poland including K2 Black Panther tanks, K9 Thunder howitzers, FA-50 aircraft, and K239 Chunmoo rocket artillery systems. This contract alone amounted to more than Korea’s total defense industry exports in 2021.

The K-defense industry has continued to gather praise both domestically and overseas. In addition to looking at expectations the K-defense industry’s future growth, this article will ask the uncomfortable question that need to be addressed when we think about the future of the industry.

 

The Opportunities presented by the Age of Peace for K-Defense

Since the Korean War, Korea has been striving to realize its dream of ‘independent national defense’. However, South Korea's wartime operational control still rests with the ROK-US Combined Forces Command (CFC). Korea does not actually have the authority to control its own troops during wartime. As a result, the dream of Korea gaining independent self-defense capability through the transfer of operational control remains out of reach so far.

On the other hand, the K-defense industry, which has been promoted since the Kim Dae Jung administration (1998-2003), has recently enjoyed some public achievements. The K-defense industry has successfully achieved rapid growth in Korea's military power, especially in the performance and localization of military weapons production, which are arguably just as important as wartime operational control.

Korea's K-defense industry has enjoyed success in multiple arenas, including on land, in the sea, and in the air. On land, Korea boasts K2 Black Panther tanks, K9 Thunder self-propelled howitzers, and the Hyunmoo series surface-to-surface guided missiles (I, II, III).

The Korean Navy has also developed 3,000-ton Dosan Anchangh-class submarines capable of firing submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) and Sejong the Great-class (Korean Aegis) destroyers. Lastly, in the air, we have the is the 4.5-generation fighter KF-21 Boramae, which entered the stage of test flight after astonishing success in localizing key technologies that the US had refused to relocate.

The K-defense industry, which has in tandem with the development of Korea's IT and manufacturing technologies, is now expanding into the overseas arena. Ironically, the demand for K-weapons is increasing as countries that neglected to invest in their domestic defense sectors in peacetime now contend with a growing security crisis resulting from strategic competition between the US and China and the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Additionally, the Korean National Assembly enacted the “Defense Industry Development and Support Act” in 2020 which institutionalized government support for the defense industry.

According to the "2022 World Defense Industry Market Almanac" published by the Defense Technology Promotion Institute, Korea ranked eighth in the world and accounted for 2.8% of the global defense industry export market between 2017 and 2021. As a result of a 177% increase in exports compared to the previous five years (2012-2016), Korea’s growth rate alone ranked first in the world. This figure is even more impressive considering that it excludes the enormous export contract with Poland mentioned earlier in this article.

In a related development, at the "Defense Industry Export Strategy Meeting" last November, President Yoon Suk Yeol presented a national goal of capturing 5% of the global defense industry market share by 2027 and to rank within the top 4 of the global defense industry. In other words, his announcement positions the K-defense industry as an emerging new Korean export industry.

 

Beware of the K-Defense Industry Exports Without Democratic Control

The growth of the K-defense industry is simply spectacular. There is no doubt that the K-defense industry’s achievements will greatly accelerate our path to independent national self-defense. But that is not the end of the story. There remains an uncomfortable question we need to ask ourselves.

In the movie "Iron Man," Tony Stark, the main character and CEO of a global weapons manufacturer, is shocked to see his weapons being used by terrorists. At a time when everyone is excited about the tremendous demand for K-defense exports, we must ask ourselves the same question that Tony Stark asked himself. What exactly is the K-Defense Industry for?

Is the K-defense industry a tool for exports? So long as we can export in extraordinary quantities, is how those exports are used irrelevant? I don't think so. We are exporting weapons of destruction. As such, we should be able to bear responsibility for the consequences when those weapons are used.

Amid intensifying U.S.-China strategic competition, "value diplomacy" is being emphasized more than ever. Our values of freedom and democracy are values that cannot be traded for anything. Yet, on our divided peninsula, peace is also a value we cannot compromise on. The K-defense industry should also be a tool for peace. Conversely, the K-defense industry cannot become a tool for aggression or terrorism.

Of course, weapons exports are not an unregulated business. South Korea’s “Decree on the Defense Acquisition Program Act” stipulates that the head of the Defense Acquisition Program Administration has the power to adjust or restrict the export of defense materials and defense technology "in the event that is necessary for international peace and security or for national security," "in the event of urgent changes in the international situation such as war and terrorism,” or if the export of said materials would likely generate "diplomatic friction”. Also the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) that took effect in 2017 also delineated measures to prevent illegal sales and appropriation of weaponry.

However, these regulations are rather vague and opaque. As the defense industry grows in importance, there is likewise a growing need for the laws surrounding the defense industry to be clearly defined. Additionally, we also need to guarantee democratic controls over the industry through the National Assembly and participation from civil society.

 

The Growth of the K-Defense Industry Should Lead to the Return of Wartime Operational Control

The growth of the K-defense industry places burdens Korea with a heavy responsibility. Rather than blindly lauding the growth of the K-defense industry, we should spend more time considering how to deal with our increased responsibility and how to place democratic controls on the industry.

Moreover, the growth of the K-defense industry should lead to the return of true self-defense, in other words, wartime operational control. The argument that the transfer of wartime operational control weakens the US-ROK alliance is tantamount to giving up on independent self-defense altogether. No country wants to relinquish operational control of its troops to another country, even under the auspices of an alliance. The United States itself has stressed that the return of wartime operational control will further advance the US-ROK alliance.

In the end, the growth of the K-defense industry should lead to an opportunity to realize the Korean dream of independent defense through the return of wartime operational control and to establish the Republic of Korea as a direct player in peace on the Korean Peninsula.


*IL-Young Jeong is a research professor at Sogang University in Seoul. His key research interests include North Korea's social control system, inter-Korean relations, and peace on the Korean Peninsula.

*This article is a column published in OhmyNews. http://omn.kr/223pb

 

Comments

Best click

Let’s Ask the Next Generation About Peace on the Korean Peninsula

  * South Korea’s Unification Minister Chung Dong-young speaks at the ‘Youth Peace and Future Dialogue’ held on August 12. ⓒ Ministry of Unification Il Young Jeong Senior Research Fellow_Institute of Social Science_Sogang University “A New Era of Peaceful Coexistence and Shared Growth on the Korean Peninsula” This was the vision for the peninsula’s future laid out by President Lee Jae-myung in his Liberation Day address on August 15, marking the 80th anniversary of Korea’s independence. For many, it may feel distant and unrealistic, given how completely inter-Korean relations remain stuck. Yet, when we recall the damage done under the Yoon Suk-yeol administration, it’s true that this new vision stirs fresh hope. Inter-Korean relations haven’t even gotten off the ground, but there is no doubt that a different kind of opportunity is opening up. The Lee administration — elected by a people who stood strong against the December 3, 2024 martial law — now speaks of a “people-centered” No...

Two States on the Korean Peninsula: Rethinking Inter-Korean Relations

  * In August 1945, despite the joy of liberation, the Korean Peninsula was divided by the great powers into North and South along the 38th parallel. ,  @IL Young Jeong Il Young Jeong Senior Research Fellow_Institute of Social Science_Sogang University On August 15, President Lee Jae-myung, in his address marking the 80th anniversary of Korea’s Liberation, stated that “the South and the North are in a special relationship in which both sides should respect and recognize each other’s systems, while pursuing peaceful unification.” He further emphasized that “the South respects the current system in the North, will not seek any form of unification by absorption, and has no intention of engaging in hostile acts.” In relation to this, on August 13, the National Policy Planning Committee, which finalized the state agenda of the Lee administration, proposed the task of “redefining inter-Korean relations on the basis of reconciliation and cooperation and institutionalizing peaceful co...

Peace and democracy on the Korean Peninsula are inseparable

  * The tense atmosphere at Panmunjom in the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) .   @iStock Il Young Jeong Research Professor_Institute of Social Science_Sogang University As we enter 2025, South Korea faces a grave domestic and international situation. President Yoon Suk-yeol's attempt to impose martial law and incite rebellion at the end of 2024 plunged the nation into shock but ultimately failed due to the united resistance of the people. However, the resulting turmoil has continued into 2025. Even more shocking is the fact that the rebellious forces attempted to provoke North Korea to justify the imposition of martial law. The government, which should be safeguarding national security and pursuing peace on the Korean Peninsula, sought to undermine democracy by exploiting the weakest links of the division system. Reflecting on this series of shocking events, we are once again painfully reminded that peace and democracy on the Korean Peninsula are inseparable. However, we cannot remai...